Using Data Streams in GA4: Avoiding Web vs. App Anti-Patterns

Using Data Streams in GA4: Avoiding Web vs. App Anti-Patterns

Google Analytics 4 (GA4) introduced Data Streams as the foundational entry points for collecting user data. These streams funnel information from your website and mobile apps into a single, unified property. This structure is powerful, giving businesses a cross-platform view of the user journey—something that was impossible in Universal Analytics.

But here’s the catch: flexibility can also bring confusion. A poorly planned Data Stream setup often leads to fragmented data, reporting issues, and distorted insights. To make GA4 work for you, it’s crucial to understand how web and app streams are meant to function—and avoid the most common anti-patterns.


The Golden Rule: One Logical User Base, One Property

Before diving into mistakes, let’s revisit the GA4 hierarchy:

  • A Property is designed for one logical user base (your brand).
  • Data Streams are platform-specific sources (Web, iOS App, Android App) feeding into that property.

In practice, most businesses should set up GA4 as follows:

  • One Property for your entire brand.
  • One Web Stream for your website.
  • One iOS App Stream for your iOS app.
  • One Android App Stream for your Android app.

This ensures GA4 can use User ID and Google Signals to de-duplicate users and track their journey across platforms—whether they first interact with your brand on the website and later convert in the app. Google’s official GA4 Data Stream guide confirms this recommended structure.


Anti-Pattern 1: Creating Separate Properties for Web and App

The mistake: Businesses create ā€œMy Brand – Webā€ and ā€œMy Brand – Appā€ as two different properties.

Why it’s wrong:

  • This destroys GA4’s core advantage: unified, cross-platform tracking.
  • Users appear duplicated—one for web, one for app—preventing a holistic view of customer journeys.

The fix:

  • Stick to one property per brand.
  • Add a Web Data Stream and App Data Stream(s) to it.
  • This way, GA4 shows you how a user discovered your website, then later installed your app and converted.

Anti-Pattern 2: Multiple Web Streams for Subdomains or Site Sections

The mistake: Creating different Web Streams for subdomains like yourcompany.com, blog.yourcompany.com, and support.yourcompany.com.

Why it’s wrong:

  1. Fragmented Journeys – A user going from main site → blog looks like they left one site and entered another, breaking sessions and inflating user counts.
  2. Configuration Overhead – Managing unwanted referrals, cross-domain tracking, and settings across multiple streams is complex and error-prone.

The fix:

  • Use one Web Data Stream for the entire domain (including subdomains).
  • Set up cross-domain tracking in that stream to preserve session continuity.
  • Later, use the Hostname dimension in GA4 reports to segment traffic by subdomain if needed.

Anti-Pattern 3: Using a Web Stream to Track a WebView in an App

The mistake: Using the website’s Measurement ID to track activity in a mobile app WebView.

Why it’s wrong:

  • A WebView is part of the app experience. Using a Web Stream breaks the chain of identity between native app screens and the WebView.
  • App-specific identifiers like app_instance_id are lost.

The fix:

  • Always use the Firebase SDK for app tracking (both native screens and WebViews).
  • This ensures app sessions remain unified. Check the Firebase Analytics documentation for proper implementation.

Anti-Pattern 4: Inconsistent Event Naming Between Streams

The mistake:

  • On web: tracking newsletter signups as generate_lead.
  • On app: tracking the same event as new_subscriber.

Why it’s wrong:

  • GA4 treats these as separate events.
  • Reports are fragmented, making it harder to count total signups across platforms.

The fix:

  • Develop a tracking plan before implementation.
  • Use consistent, clear event names across web and app (e.g., form_submit).
  • Stick to GA4’s best practices for naming conventions—such as snake_case—to ensure clarity and scalability. For a deeper dive, see event naming conventions best practices.

Best Practices for Healthy Data Streams

To wrap up, here are the golden rules for Data Stream hygiene in GA4:

  1. One Property per Brand – Keep web and app under one roof.
  2. One Web Stream per Website – Don’t split by subdomain or section.
  3. Right Tool for the Job – Use the Firebase SDK for apps, G-ID (gtag.js or GTM) for web.
  4. Standardize Naming – Keep event and parameter names consistent across platforms.
  5. Use Filters, Not Separate Properties – If you need to analyze specific data streams, apply filters or comparisons in GA4 reports instead of duplicating properties.

Final Thoughts

GA4’s Data Streams are a powerful upgrade from the siloed days of Universal Analytics—but only if used correctly. By avoiding these anti-patterns and following best practices, you’ll have clean, unified, and actionable data that reflects the true customer journey.

When set up wisely, Data Streams empower GA4 to deliver on its promise: a 360-degree view of your users across web and app.

Need help implementing GA4, GTM, or KPI restructuring?
Schedule free consultation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *